The questions we actually get asked.

Twenty markets across South Asia, Southeast Asia, APAC, Latin America and Turkey & North Africa, covering 102 named local methods.

The full list is published on our Coverage pages — every method, per country, with its direction and settlement window. We publish it because a merchant deciding where to launch needs the list, not a headline number.

Sometimes, and we will tell you honestly which. Adding a market means finding local providers, testing settlement and confirming the regulatory position — not flipping a switch.

If we cannot serve a corridor well, we would rather say so than take you live on something fragile.

Both. Sixty-five of our 102 methods move money in both directions.

Withdrawals return to the instrument the deposit came from — the same wallet, the same bank account. It is the fastest route and the cleanest position to defend if anyone asks how funds moved.

It varies by market and is published per country. Brazil settles same day. Most of South and Southeast Asia is T+1. Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Myanmar and Egypt are typically T+2.

Those windows are on every Coverage page, next to the currency.

That is the right question, and almost nobody publishes an answer. Collecting is straightforward nearly everywhere in our footprint; repatriation is where the work sits.

We rate every market on our Coverage index — straightforward, workable with structure, or materially constrained — and explain why. India runs under FEMA with a Liberalised Remittance Scheme cap. Egypt applies capital controls on large cross-border movement and restricts profit repatriation. Argentina lifted most exchange controls in 2025 but has changed direction before.

We would rather discuss this before you launch than after you have a balance you cannot move.

Where it is lawful and sensible, and not where it is not.

Brazil's Resolution BCB 561 bars eFX providers from settling cross-border remittances in stablecoins or crypto from 1 October 2026, and prohibits algorithmic non-fiat-backed stablecoins outright. Licensed VASPs retain a narrower path. If your plan for Brazil assumed stablecoin settlement, it needs revisiting.

We will tell you this before you build around it, not after.

None yet. We are early, and we would rather tell you that plainly than imply otherwise.

We operate through licensed local providers in each market, and the regulatory position for your specific corridors is something we will walk you through during onboarding — including where it means we cannot serve you.

If holding a licence directly is a hard requirement for your business today, we are not the right provider yet. We would rather lose the deal than mislead you into one.

Because a published address in this industry fills up with agents, aggregators and people who are not going to transact.

The application asks four questions about your business before it asks who you are. It takes about two minutes, and it means whoever replies has already read your markets and volumes rather than starting from nothing.

One API. Adding a market or a method afterwards is configuration, not another engineering cycle.

You can take the hosted cashier, which is built mobile-first for 3G and mid-range Android because that is what traffic in these markets actually runs on, or integrate directly and keep your own checkout.

Webhooks fire on every state change, and every transaction carries a stable reference through settlement so reconciliation closes without manual matching.

They depend on the market, the method and your volume — a wallet in Bangladesh and a bank transfer in Japan are not the same cost base, and quoting one blended rate would be meaningless.

Indicative pricing for your specific corridors comes back with the response to your application.

No. We work with licensed operators, and we configure method availability against the licence you hold and the markets it covers.

If your licence does not cover a market, we will not enable methods for it — and we will say so during onboarding rather than after something breaks.

Mostly by moving volume onto rails where the dispute mechanism does not exist. Account-to-account payments carry materially lower chargeback exposure than cross-border cards, which removes the problem rather than managing it.

Where disputes do arise, they are surfaced early rather than arriving as a monthly surprise.

It happens — local enforcement can freeze an individual channel without warning, most visibly in India.

That is why we run more than one provider per method wherever the market allows it. A declined attempt cascades to the next route before the user sees an error, so a frozen channel is a bad hour rather than a bad quarter.